Cited by 408Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesFamily and Disability Support Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention: Outcomes for Children With Autism and Their Parents After Two Years

Remington, Bob, Hastings, Richard P., Kovshoff, Hanna, degli Espinosa, Francesca, Jahr, Erik, Brown, Tony, Alsford, Paula, Lemaic, Monika, Ward, Nicholas·2007·American Journal on Mental Retardation

Abstract

An intervention group (n=23) of preschool children with autism was identified on the basis of parent preference for early intensive behavioral intervention and a comparison group (n=21) identified as receiving treatment as usual. Prospective assessment was undertaken before treatment, after 1 year of treatment, and again after 2 years. Groups did not differ on assessments at baseline but after 2 years, robust differences favoring intensive behavioral intervention were observed on measures of intelligence, language, daily living skills, positive social behavior, and a statistical measure of best outcome for individual children. Measures of parental well-being, obtained at the same three time points, produced no evidence that behavioral intervention created increased problems for either mothers or fathers of children receiving it.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1352/0895-8017(2007)112[418:eibiof]2.0.co;2

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comprehensive interventions that blend developmental and behavioral approaches have successfully improved adaptive functioning in many studies.

    “Comprehensive interventions that blend developmental and behavioral approaches have successfully improved adaptive functioning in many studies. 17 , 23 , 29 , 31”
  • Our analysis supports the effectiveness of integrated developmental and behavioral interventions, outside of the laboratory setting, in improving developmental quotients, adaptive functioning, and language skills.

    “Our analysis supports the effectiveness of integrated developmental and behavioral interventions, outside of the laboratory setting, in improving developmental quotients, adaptive functioning, and language skills. 17 , 29”
  • Two nonrandomized controlled studies were rated as producing strong recommendations: comprehensive applied behavior analysis (ABA)-type interventions were associated with significantly improved outcomes relative to the comparison group after 2 years (compared with publicly funded educational services) and with significantly improved outcomes in a subset of participants after 1 year (compared with,

    “Two nonrandomized controlled studies were rated as producing strong recommendations: comprehensive applied behavior analysis (ABA)-type interventions were associated with significantly improved outcomes relative to the comparison group after 2 years (compared with publicly funded educational services) 29 and with significantly improved outcomes in a subset of participants after 1 year (compared”
  • In the 2 comprehensive developmental/behavioral programs for which there is moderate or high evidence of effectiveness, parents were supported in complementing educators and therapists in the delivery of the interventions because of the importance of, and challenges inherent in, carrying over services and generalizing skills across multiple settings.

    “In the 2 comprehensive developmental/behavioral programs for which we have moderate or high evidence of effectiveness, 17 , 29 parents were supported in complementing educators and therapists in the delivery of the interventions because of the importance of, and challenges inherent in, carrying over services and generalizing skills across multiple settings.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Remington, B., Hastings, R. P., Kovshoff, H., degli Espinosa, F., Jahr, E., Brown, T., Alsford, P., Lemaic, M., & Ward, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Akershus University Hospital (NO)
Venue
American Journal on Mental Retardation
Published
2007
Volume
112
Issue
6
Pages
418
ISSN
0895-8017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160736174
Cited by
402
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 28
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal on Mental Retardation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
early intensive behavioral intervention, autism spectrum disorder, preschool children, intervention outcomes, parental well-being, language development, intelligence, daily living skills, social behavior, usual care, parents
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Autistic Disorder, Behavior Therapy, Child, Demography, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Periodicity, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review